czy ktoś z Was analizował tę suttę? ( http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html )
"And what is wrong view? 'There is nothing given, nothing offered, nothing sacrificed. There is no fruit or result of good or bad actions. There is no this world, no next world, no mother, no father, no spontaneously reborn beings; no contemplatives or brahmans who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves.'"
szczerze mówiąc trochę utknęłam"And what is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions? 'There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously reborn beings; there are contemplatives & brahmans who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves.'"
Co jest dane, oferowane, poświęcone?
O co chodzi z matką i ojcem? Czy w Pali te słowa mają jakieś szersze znaczenie i np. odnoszą się do pierwiastka żeńskiego i męskiego? czy tak po prostu chodzi o matkę i ojca?
Jak Wy rozumiecie te słowa?
pozdrawiam